Since the passage of the Waxman-Hatch Act in 1984, marketers have viewed generic competition as a death knell for brand-name
products. That attitude discounts the impact of marketing; specifically, the power of a brand's position that consumers hold
in their minds. Brand marketers who face generic competition have more marketing strategies available than they currently
use.
Advances in the computing power of PCs and the ability to micro-position and micro-market to physicians, consumers, and pharmacists
have opened up new marketing avenues. When used correctly, the tools can slow the rapid erosion of a brand's market share
after patent expiration.
 Pillars of Modern Marketing
|
In the 1950s, when Rosser Reeves developed the advertising and marketing theory of the "unique selling proposition," he was
convinced the uniqueness of a product benefit could overcome a significant price differential. Similarly, in the 1960s, David
Ogilvy believed that a product's image, if properly communicated, was strong enough to compel consumer loyalty over a lower
priced competitive product. Both of those advertising theories are still credible today. The link that brings them together
and creates a powerful strategy to stem the generic tide can be found in Jack Trout and Al Ries' 1981 publication, Positioning:
The Battle for Your Mind. (See "Pillars of Modern Marketing,")
This article describes several new strategies that product managers can use when generic competition is on the horizon. Such
strategies take advantage of the position the branded product already has in the minds of consumers as a result of direct
to consumer advertising.
First and Foremost Almost everyone can recall their first kiss, but few can remember the second. And nearly all Westerners know that Charles
Lindbergh was the first person to fly solo across the Atlantic. No one can name the second person to do so. That is the critical
characteristic of the human mind Trout and Ries identified and applied to advertising.
The power of being first is incredibly strong. In today's over-communicated society, the human mind has just so much it can
remember. To make sense of all the incoming messages, the brain creates a product ladder, and each ladder has only a few rungs
on it. For instance, if asked to name mid-sized automobile brands, most people could come up with five or six at most.
Although Avis' brilliant advertising campaign, "We're Number Two, We Try Harder" glorified being second, number one is still
the coveted position. If asked to name the first successful antidepressant, most consumers would answer Prozac (fluoxetine)-even
though other antidepressants have been on the market for decades.
Lilly's aggressive DTC campaign propelled Prozac to the top rung of the product ladder in the minds of most consumers. But
that position can change over time; it is not cast in concrete like the first kiss. Without a new marketing strategy, the
name Prozac will slowly fade in consumers' minds.
One pharma company that has successfully used a positioning strategy to build corporate image is Bristol-Myers Squibb. BMS
is investing heavily in a DTC campaign that promotes the company as "the cancer specialists." Built around the remarkable
success of pitchman Lance Armstrong, the three-time Tour de France winner, BMS has succeeded in filling the number one slot
in most consumers minds as the company most devoted to finding cancer cures. When the company's cancer drugs eventually lose
their patent protections, the image of Lance Armstrong with his hands held high after a victory will still be a powerful influence
in the minds of cancer patients.
Walk-Away Syndrome When pharma marketing executives hear the word generic-their eyes glaze and their hearts palpitate. Understandably so. Innovator
companies invest $500 million in bringing new products to market, and after eight to ten years of clinical trials, they can
secure only ten to twelve years of exclusivity before they face generic competition.
The reaction to that competition is usually the same, pharma executives "walk away" from the product. They slash promotional
budgets and reassign marketing executives-some who had spent 12-hour days developing and implementing brand strategies-to
the next big launch. Companies facing generic competition often simply raise the price of the brand to take advantage of the
loyalty that still exists.
 Current Generic Strategies
|
That strategy not only ignores new marketing tools available, but also discounts the position the product has successfully
occupied in the minds of consumers. But most important, it ignores the most significant trend in the history of pharmaceutical
marketing-direct to consumer advertising. (See "Current Generic Strategies,")
In their first few years on the market, many blockbuster drugs have advertising budgets in excess of $100 million. Yet, when
a generic competitor enters the market with the same molecule, the branded drug no longer receives funding for DTC advertising.
That strategy ignores the lessons learned from both the unique selling proposition and the image approach. Although the brand-name
therapy facing competition is no longer a unique product, the money invested has created a unique image in consumers' minds.